Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Comparison
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Sony a6400
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Canon | Sony | |
Model | EOS R6 Mark II | a6400 | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2022 | 2019 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | February 11, 2022 | January 15, 2019 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II outperforms the Sony a6400 with a score of 78/100 compared to the latter’s 70/100. Both cameras are mirrorless, released in 2022 and 2019 respectively. They share common specifications, but the Canon EOS R6 Mark II excels in certain areas.
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II has a larger size (138.4 �� 98.4 �� 88.4mm) and is heavier (588g), which might offer better ergonomics and stability. However, the Sony a6400 is more compact (120 x 67 x 60mm) and lighter (403g), making it easier to carry around.
Despite its higher launch price of $2499, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II justifies the cost with its superior performance. On the other hand, the Sony a6400 offers a more affordable option at $900 without compromising too much on quality.
Taking all aspects into account, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II proves to be a better camera, while the Sony a6400 remains a solid choice for those on a budget.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Overview and Optics
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II outperforms the Sony a6400 in optics, with a score of 83/100 versus 68/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as 24 megapixels, CMOS sensor type, and compatible lens mounts (Canon RF for EOS R6 Mark II and Sony E for a6400).
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II excels in several areas. Its full-frame sensor size provides superior image quality compared to the Sony a6400’s APS-C sensor. The EOS R6 Mark II also boasts a higher DXOMARK score of 91, indicating better overall sensor performance. The camera’s shooting speed of 40 is significantly faster than the a6400’s 11, allowing for quicker capture of action shots. Additionally, the EOS R6 Mark II features image stabilization, which the a6400 lacks, leading to steadier and sharper images.
The Sony a6400, while lagging behind the EOS R6 Mark II, has a slight advantage in megapixels at 24.2. However, this minor difference does not significantly impact image quality. The a6400’s Bionz X processor is inferior to the EOS R6 Mark II’s Digic X processor, contributing to the lower overall score.
Comparing the two cameras, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is the clear winner in terms of optics, due to its full-frame sensor, faster shooting speed, and image stabilization capabilities. The Sony a6400, though slightly higher in megapixels, falls short in other critical areas, making it less desirable for those prioritizing superior optics.
|
Optics
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 24 MP | 24.2 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6000 x 4000 px | 6000 x 4000 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 24 x 36 mm | 15.6 x 23.5 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  Full Frame |  APS-C | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 40 fps | 11 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Canon RF | Sony E | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Digic X | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 100 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 102,400 | 32,000 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 50 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 204800 | 102400 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 8000 s | 1/ 4000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 4,897 | 425 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   |  | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 3,690,000 dots | 2,359,296 dots |
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Video Performance
The Sony a6400 wins in the video capabilities comparison, scoring 91/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II scores 83/100. Both cameras share common video specifications, including 4K max video resolution, 3840 x 2160 max video dimensions, and built-in time-lapse functionality.
The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in video frame rate, offering a maximum of 120fps compared to the Canon’s 60fps. This higher frame rate allows the Sony a6400 to capture smoother slow-motion footage, providing more creative flexibility for videographers.
Despite the lower score, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II still has great video capabilities. It matches the Sony a6400 in max video resolution, dimensions, and time-lapse functionality. However, the Sony a6400’s higher score is due to its superior video frame rate, which makes it a better option for those prioritizing video performance.
While the Canon EOS R6 Mark II falls short in video frame rate, it remains a solid choice for videographers looking for a camera with strong video capabilities. The Sony a6400, on the other hand, excels in this area, making it the ideal choice for those who need a higher frame rate for their projects. Both cameras offer impressive video features, but the Sony a6400’s higher score and frame rate make it the clear winner in this comparison.
|
Video
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K | 4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 3840 x 2160 px | 3840 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 60 p | 120 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4, MOV | MPEG-4, AVCHD Ver. 2.0, XAVC S |
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Features and Benefits
The Sony a6400 emerges as the winner with a feature score of 81/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II scores 72/100. Both cameras share several specs, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Sony a6400 surpasses the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in terms of features. Despite having the same screen size, the a6400 boasts a higher screen resolution of 921,600 dots, compared to the R6 Mark II’s 1,620,000 dots. This results in a crisper and clearer display for the a6400, allowing for better image preview and menu navigation. Additionally, the a6400 has a higher overall feature score, indicating that it offers more advanced and versatile capabilities.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II has one advantage over the Sony a6400: GPS functionality. This feature allows the R6 Mark II to geotag photos, which can be useful for photographers who travel or need to keep track of locations for their work. However, this single advantage does not outweigh the overall better performance and features of the Sony a6400.
Given these points, the Sony a6400 proves to be the superior camera in terms of features, offering a higher resolution display and a more advanced set of capabilities. Although the Canon EOS R6 Mark II has the added benefit of GPS functionality, it falls short in comparison to the a6400’s impressive features.
|
Features
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,620,000 dots | 921,600 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Storage and Battery
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II wins the storage and battery comparison with a score of 68/100, while the Sony a6400 scores 31 points lower at 37/100. Both cameras share the same memory card compatibility, accepting SD/SDHC/SDXC cards and offering USB charging. However, the R6 Mark II has two memory card slots and supports faster UHS-II cards, giving it an advantage in storage capacity and speed.
The Sony a6400, on the other hand, has a longer battery life, providing 410 shots compared to the R6 Mark II’s 360 shots. Despite this advantage, it only has one memory card slot and supports the slower UHS-I cards. The Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s dual slots and faster card compatibility make it the superior choice for storage and battery performance.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo (UHS-I compatible) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | LP-E6NH | NP-FW50 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 360 shots | 410 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 24 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 13.6 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 1431 |
|
Scores
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
Main Features | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Extra Features | N/A | ||
Construction and Durability | N/A | ||
Handling and Ergonomics | N/A | ||
Value for Money | N/A | ||
Total Score | N/A |
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony a6400 – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R6 Mark II or the Sony a6400:
|
User Scores
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
|---|