CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Ricoh GR III vs Sony ZV-1 Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Ricoh GR III

ricoh gr iii
Winner!
66%

Sony ZV-1

sony zv1
65%
Ricoh GR III
vs
Sony ZV-1
Price
Brand
Ricoh
Sony
Model
GR III
ZV-1
Released
2018
2020
Announcement Date
September 25, 2018
May 26, 2020
Camera Type
Compact
Compact
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Ricoh GR III edges out the Sony ZV-1 with a score of 66/100 compared to 65/100. Both cameras are compact models, with the Ricoh GR III announced in 2018 and the Sony ZV-1 in 2020. They share similarities in size, with the Ricoh GR III measuring 109 x 62 x 33mm and the Sony ZV-1 at 105 x 60 x 44mm.

The Ricoh GR III excels with its lighter weight of 257g, making it more portable than the Sony ZV-1, which weighs 294g. On the other hand, the Sony ZV-1 has a lower launch price of $800, compared to the Ricoh GR III’s $899 price tag, making it more affordable.

Each camera has its advantages, with the Ricoh GR III offering greater portability and the Sony ZV-1 being more budget-friendly. Ultimately, the choice depends on the user’s priorities and preferences.

Optics
Optics
68%
67%
Megapixels
24 MP
20 MP
Image Resolution
6000 x 4000 px
5472 x 3648 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
13.2 x 8.8 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
1"
Frame Rate
4 fps
24 fps
Lens Mount
Fixed
Fixed
Image Processor
GR Engine 6
Bionz X
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
125
Maximum ISO (Native)
102,400
12,800
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
125
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
102400
25600
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 2000 s
Autofocus Points
1
315
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
None

Ricoh GR III vs Sony ZV-1 Video Performance

The Sony ZV-1 outperforms the Ricoh GR III in video capabilities with a video score of 91/100 compared to the Ricoh GR III’s 70/100. Both cameras share some common features, such as time-lapse functionality built in. However, the Sony ZV-1 offers superior video specifications, making it the better choice for video enthusiasts.

The Sony ZV-1 boasts a maximum video resolution of 4K (3840 x 2160), whereas the Ricoh GR III’s maximum video resolution is Full HD (1920 x 1080). This means that the Sony ZV-1 can capture videos with higher detail and clarity than the Ricoh GR III. In addition, the Sony ZV-1 has a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, which is double the Ricoh GR III’s 60fps. This allows the Sony ZV-1 to produce smoother slow-motion footage and provide more flexibility in post-production.

Although the Ricoh GR III has a lower video score, it still offers quality Full HD video recording and time-lapse functionality. This might be sufficient for casual videographers or those who primarily focus on photography but occasionally dabble in video.

Considering the video specifications of both cameras, the Sony ZV-1 clearly outshines the Ricoh GR III in terms of video performance. With 4K resolution and a higher frame rate, the Sony ZV-1 caters to more serious videographers or content creators seeking higher quality footage. On the other hand, the Ricoh GR III may suffice for those who prioritize photography and only require basic video capabilities.

Video
Video
70%
91%
Video
Max Video Resolution
Full HD
4K
Max Video Dimensions
1920 x 1080 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
120 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MPEG-4, MOV
MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S

Ricoh GR III vs Sony ZV-1 Features and Benefits

The Ricoh GR III wins the feature comparison with a score of 70/100, while the Sony ZV-1 scores 68/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, WiFi, and Bluetooth connectivity. However, there are noteworthy differences that set these two cameras apart.

The Ricoh GR III is superior in screen resolution with 1,037,000 dots compared to the Sony ZV-1’s 921,600 dots. This higher resolution provides a sharper and clearer image on the camera’s screen, making it easier to review and compose shots.

On the other hand, the Sony ZV-1 has a flip screen, which the Ricoh GR III lacks. The flip screen is a valuable feature for vloggers and content creators, as it allows them to see themselves while recording or taking selfies. This advantage makes the Sony ZV-1 more suitable for users who prioritize this functionality.

Neither camera has GPS, which might be a drawback for users who wish to geotag their images. However, both cameras offer WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity, making it convenient to transfer images and remotely control the camera via a smartphone.

Comparing these two cameras, the Ricoh GR III’s higher screen resolution makes it a better choice for photographers who prioritize image clarity on the camera’s screen. The Sony ZV-1, with its flip screen, is more suitable for vloggers and content creators who need to see themselves while recording. Ultimately, the right camera depends on the user’s specific needs and preferences.

Features
Features
70%
68%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
TFT LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
1,037,000 dots
921,600 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Ricoh GR III vs Sony ZV-1 Storage and Battery

The Sony ZV-1 wins in the storage and battery category with a score of 29/100, while the Ricoh GR III scores 27/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and support USB charging. They accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, with the ZV-1 also compatible with Memory Stick Pro Duo and Pro-HG Duo cards.

The ZV-1 outperforms the GR III in battery life, providing 260 shots per charge compared to the GR III’s 200 shots. This advantage makes the ZV-1 more suitable for extended shooting sessions. The GR III, however, does offer internal storage, which could be beneficial in situations where an additional memory card is unavailable.

Despite the ZV-1’s slight advantage in battery life and memory card compatibility, both cameras have limitations in their storage and battery capabilities. Users must consider these factors when deciding on the ideal camera for their needs.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
27%
29%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible), Internal Storage
SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
DB-110
NP-BX1
Battery Life
200 shots
260 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Scores
Main Features
84%
N/A
Extra Features
84%
N/A
Construction and Durability
80%
N/A
Handling and Ergonomics
93%
N/A
Value for Money
95%
N/A
Total Score
87%
N/A

Ricoh GR III vs Sony ZV-1 – Our Verdict

Ricoh GR III vs Sony ZV-1 Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Ricoh GR III or the Sony ZV-1:

User Scores
B&H photo video
Spotted a mistake with these camera specs? Please let us know so we can update it!