Sony a6600 vs a7R III Comparison

The Sony a7R III emerges as the winner with a score of 83/100, compared to the Sony a6600‘s 75/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were launched in 2017 and 2019, respectively. They share similarities in size, with the a7R III being slightly larger at 127 x 96 x 74mm and heavier at 657g. The a6600 measures 120 x 67 x 69mm and weighs 503g.

The a7R III’s superior score is due to its higher performance and features, despite its higher launch price of $3200 compared to the a6600’s $1200. On the other hand, the Sony a6600 is more affordable and lighter, making it a more budget-friendly and portable option.

Taking these factors into account, the Sony a7R III is the better choice for professionals and those seeking a higher-end camera, while the Sony a6600 is a great option for hobbyists and those looking for a more compact and budget-friendly camera.

Sony a6600 vs a7R III Overview and Optics

The Sony a7R III outperforms the Sony a6600 in optics with a score of 84/100 compared to 76/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as the CMOS sensor type, Bionz X processor, Sony lens mount, and image stabilisation. However, there are significant differences that contribute to the higher score of the Sony a7R III.

The Sony a7R III has a higher megapixel count at 42.4, compared to the a6600’s 24.2. This results in better resolution and image quality. Additionally, the a7R III boasts a full-frame sensor, which allows for improved low-light performance and increased dynamic range. This advantage is further highlighted by the a7R III’s DXOMARK sensor score of 100, compared to the a6600’s score of 82.

On the other hand, the Sony a6600 offers a slightly faster shooting speed at 11 frames per second, compared to the a7R III’s 10 frames per second. This may be beneficial for capturing fast-moving subjects or action photography. However, this difference in shooting speed is relatively minor and may not be a deciding factor for many users.

In terms of optics, the Sony a7R III is the clear winner with its higher resolution, full-frame sensor, and superior DXOMARK sensor score. These features contribute to its overall better performance in image quality and low-light conditions. While the Sony a6600 does offer a marginally faster shooting speed, it does not outweigh the advantages provided by the a7R III’s superior optics. Therefore, the Sony a7R III is the recommended choice for those prioritizing optics in their camera selection.

The Sony a6600 emerges as the superior camera in terms of video capabilities, with a score of 91/100 compared to the Sony a7R III’s score of 56/100. This significant difference in scores highlights the a6600’s better performance in video recording.

Both cameras share common specifications, such as a maximum video resolution of 4K and video dimensions of 3840 x 2160. However, the Sony a6600 outperforms the a7R III in several aspects. Firstly, the a6600 boasts a maximum video frame rate of 100fps, whereas the a7R III only reaches 30fps. This difference allows the a6600 to produce smoother, more detailed slow-motion footage, making it a more versatile option for videographers.

Additionally, the Sony a6600 has built-in time-lapse functionality, which the a7R III lacks. This feature enables users to create stunning time-lapse videos without the need for additional equipment or software, further contributing to the a6600’s superiority in video capabilities.

Despite its lower video score, the Sony a7R III still offers excellent video quality with its 4K resolution and 3840 x 2160 dimensions. However, its lower frame rate and lack of built-in time-lapse functionality ultimately place it behind the a6600 in terms of video performance.

Based on these comparisons, the Sony a6600 is the clear winner in video capabilities due to its higher frame rate and built-in time-lapse feature. While the a7R III remains a solid choice for those seeking 4K video quality, those looking for a more versatile and advanced video camera should opt for the a6600.

The Sony a7R III outperforms the Sony a6600 in features, with a score of 83/100 compared to 81/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, flip screen, absence of GPS, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.

The Sony a7R III excels with its screen resolution of 1,440,000 dots, which is significantly higher than the a6600’s 921,600 dots. This higher resolution provides a sharper and clearer display, enhancing user experience and allowing for more precise image review and composition. This advantage contributes to the a7R III’s higher feature score.

The Sony a6600, despite its lower feature score, still offers competitive specifications. Its touchscreen, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth capabilities match those of the a7R III. However, its lower screen resolution does not hinder its overall performance and usability. The a6600 remains a strong contender in the camera market, especially for those who prioritize compactness and affordability over a higher-resolution screen.

In comparing the two cameras, the Sony a7R III emerges as the winner in terms of features due to its superior screen resolution. However, the Sony a6600 remains a viable option for users who value compactness and affordability while maintaining essential features. Ultimately, the choice between these cameras depends on individual preferences and priorities.

The Sony a7R III outperforms the Sony a6600 in storage and battery, scoring 65/100 compared to the a6600’s 48/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as accepting SD/SDHC/SDXC memory cards and utilizing the NP-FZ100 battery type.

The a7R III has a clear advantage with its dual memory card slots, which are UHS-II compatible, allowing for faster data transfer and better performance. This feature makes it more suitable for professional use, where backup and storage capacity are crucial. However, the a6600’s battery life is superior, delivering 810 shots per charge compared to the a7R III’s 650 shots. Additionally, the a6600 offers USB charging, providing more flexibility for on-the-go photographers.

While the a7R III excels in storage capacity and performance, the a6600’s longer battery life and USB charging make it a more convenient option for casual users. Ultimately, the choice between these cameras depends on the individual’s priorities and intended usage.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Sony a6600 or the Sony a7R III:

• Sony a6400 vs a6600
• Sony a7 III vs a7R III
• Sony a7 IV vs a7R III
• Fujifilm X-T5 vs Sony a6600
• Sony a6600 vs a7C
• Sony a7R III vs a7R IV