Canon EOS 5D Mark II vs EOS 5D Mark IV Comparison
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Canon | Canon | |
Model | EOS 5D Mark II | EOS 5D Mark IV | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2008 | 2016 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | September 17, 2008 | August 25, 2016 | |
Camera Type |  DSLR | DSLR | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV outperforms its predecessor, the Canon EOS 5D Mark II, with a score of 75/100 compared to 58/100. Both cameras are DSLR models, and they share similar dimensions, with the Mark IV being slightly larger and heavier. The Mark II was released in 2008 with a launch price of $2,199, while the Mark IV was released in 2016 with a price of $3,500.
The Mark IV’s higher score indicates its superiority in terms of features and performance. It offers a more advanced autofocus system, improved image quality, and faster continuous shooting. On the other hand, the Mark II’s lower score doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a bad camera. In fact, it still delivers excellent image quality and is a more affordable option for those on a budget.
Considering the differences in specifications and release dates, it’s clear that the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is a better camera overall, but the Mark II remains a solid choice for those seeking a more budget-friendly option.
Canon EOS 5D Mark II vs EOS 5D Mark IV Overview and Optics
The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV outperforms the Canon EOS 5D Mark II in optics, scoring 76/100 compared to the Mark II’s 59/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, including the CMOS sensor type, full-frame sensor size, Canon EF lens mount, and the lack of image stabilization.
The 5D Mark IV’s superiority in optics is evident in its higher megapixel count of 30.4, compared to the Mark II’s 21 megapixels. This increase in resolution enables the Mark IV to capture more detail and produce higher quality images. Additionally, the Mark IV has a faster shooting speed of 7 frames per second, compared to the Mark II’s 3.9 frames per second. This allows the Mark IV to capture fast-moving subjects more effectively. The Mark IV also boasts a superior processor, the Digic 6+, which enhances image processing and overall performance. Lastly, the Mark IV’s DXOMARK sensor score of 91 indicates a better sensor performance than the Mark II’s score of 79.
Although the 5D Mark II falls short in several aspects, it still offers a reliable full-frame sensor and a compatible Canon EF lens mount, allowing users to utilize a wide range of high-quality lenses. While its shooting speed and sensor performance are not as impressive as the Mark IV’s, the Mark II remains a solid choice for photographers who prioritize affordability over the latest features.
Considering the differences in optics, the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is the clear winner, providing better image quality, faster shooting speed, and an improved processor. However, the Canon EOS 5D Mark II remains a viable option for those seeking a more budget-friendly full-frame camera with access to Canon’s extensive lens lineup.
|
Optics
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 21 MP | 30.4 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 5616 x 3744 px | 6720 x 4480 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 24 x 36 mm | 24 x 36 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  Full Frame | Full Frame | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 3.9 fps | 7 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Canon EF | Canon EF | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Digic 4 | Digic 6+ | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 100 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 6,400 | 32,000 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 50 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 25600 | 102400 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 8000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 9 | 61 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   | | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Canon EOS 5D Mark II vs EOS 5D Mark IV Video Performance
The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV outperforms the Canon EOS 5D Mark II in video capabilities, as evidenced by its significantly higher video score of 91/100 compared to the Mark II’s score of 43/100. Both cameras share Full HD video resolution and a maximum video dimension of 1920 x 1080. However, the Mark IV excels with additional features and specifications that make it a superior choice for video recording.
The Mark IV’s video quality is superior due to its 4K video resolution, which is a notable improvement from the Mark II’s Full HD resolution. Additionally, the Mark IV boasts a maximum video dimension of 4096 x 2160, which allows for larger and more detailed video footage. The Mark IV also offers a higher maximum video frame rate of 120fps, compared to the Mark II’s 30fps. This enables the Mark IV to capture smoother and more professional-looking footage, especially during fast-paced action scenes.
The Mark IV also has a built-in time-lapse functionality, which the Mark II lacks. This feature allows users to create stunning time-lapse videos without requiring any additional equipment or software.
The Mark II does not have any significant advantages in video capabilities over the Mark IV. The only shared specifications between the two cameras are Full HD resolution and 1920 x 1080 video dimensions, which are both surpassed by the Mark IV’s superior features.
Considering the significant differences in video capabilities, the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is the clear winner in this comparison. Its higher video score, 4K resolution, larger video dimensions, faster frame rate, and built-in time-lapse functionality make it a more versatile and powerful choice for video recording. The Mark II, while still capable of producing quality Full HD footage, falls short in comparison to the Mark IV’s advanced video capabilities.
|
Video
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |   | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  Full HD |  4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 1920 x 1080 px | 4096 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 30 p | 120 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MOV | MOV, MP4 |
Canon EOS 5D Mark II vs EOS 5D Mark IV Features and Benefits
The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV outperforms the Canon EOS 5D Mark II with a feature score of 74/100 compared to the Mark II’s 54/100. Both cameras share some specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, no flip screen, WIFI connectivity, and no Bluetooth capabilities.
The Mark IV stands out with its higher screen resolution of 1,620,000 dots compared to the Mark II’s 920,000 dots. This difference provides the Mark IV with a clearer and more detailed display. Additionally, the Mark IV has a touchscreen, which the Mark II lacks. This feature allows for easier navigation and quicker adjustments. The Mark IV also includes GPS, enabling users to geotag their images with location data, a feature absent in the Mark II.
On the other hand, the Mark II does not offer any significant advantages over the Mark IV in terms of features. Both cameras have the same screen size and lack a flip screen and Bluetooth capabilities. The only advantage the Mark II holds is its lower price point, making it a more budget-friendly option.
Considering the specifications and features, the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is the better camera of the two. Its higher feature score is a result of its superior screen resolution, touchscreen, and GPS capabilities. While the Mark II may be a more affordable option, the Mark IV offers a more advanced and convenient user experience.
|
Features
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" |  3.2" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 920,000 dots | 1,620,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Canon EOS 5D Mark II vs EOS 5D Mark IV Storage and Battery
The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV prevails over the Canon EOS 5D Mark II in the storage and battery category, both scoring 71/100. Both cameras share common specifications, including two memory card slots and the absence of USB charging. The 5D Mark IV accepts SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) and Compact Flash memory cards, while the 5D Mark II accepts Compact Flash (Type I or II), UDMA, and Microdrive cards.
The 5D Mark IV offers a slightly better battery life with 900 shots, compared to the 5D Mark II’s 850 shots. Additionally, the 5D Mark IV uses the LP-E6N battery type, while the 5D Mark II uses the LP-E6 battery. There is no specific advantage for the 5D Mark II in this comparison.
Considering these points, the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV proves to be superior in terms of storage and battery life, making it a better choice for photographers who value these features.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | Compact Flash (Type I or II), UDMA, Microdrive | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible), Compact Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | LP-E6 | LP-E6N | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 850 shots | 900 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | 23.7 bits | 24.8 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | 11.9 EVs | 13.6 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | 1815 | 2995 |
|
Scores
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark II vs EOS 5D Mark IV – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS 5D Mark II or the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV:
|
User Scores
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
|
|
B&H photo video |
|---|