Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7 III
Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2
Sony a7 III
Price |
from
Check Price
|
from
Check Price
| |
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Fujifilm | Sony | |
Model | X-H2 | a7 III | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2022 | 2018 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | May 31, 2022 | February 27, 2018 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Fujifilm X-H2 edges out the Sony a7 III with a score of 82/100 as opposed to 80/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were launched at a similar price, around $2000. They share comparable weights, with the X-H2 weighing 660g and the a7 III weighing 650g.
The Fujifilm X-H2 stands out due to its more recent release in 2022, while the Sony a7 III was released in 2018. This gives the X-H2 an advantage in terms of newer technology and features. The X-H2 is also slightly larger in size, measuring 136 x 93 x 95mm, compared to the a7 III’s 127 x 96 x 74mm dimensions.
On the other hand, the Sony a7 III’s smaller size makes it a more compact option for those who prioritize portability. Despite the slight difference in scores, both cameras offer excellent performance and value for their price. Ultimately, the choice between the Fujifilm X-H2 and Sony a7 III depends on individual preferences and priorities in a camera.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7 III Overview and Optics
The Fujifilm X-H2 and the Sony a7 III both achieve an optics score of 81/100, indicating a tie in terms of optical performance. These cameras share common features, such as a CMOS sensor, image stabilization, and compatibility with their respective lens mounts (Fujifilm X and Sony FE).
The Fujifilm X-H2 excels with its 40-megapixel sensor and a shooting speed of 15 frames per second, compared to the Sony a7 III’s 24.2-megapixel sensor and 10 frames per second. The X-H2’s X-Processor 5 also contributes to its impressive performance. These factors make the Fujifilm X-H2 superior for capturing high-resolution images and fast-paced action.
On the other hand, the Sony a7 III has a full-frame sensor, while the Fujifilm X-H2 has an APS-C sensor. The a7 III’s larger sensor allows for better low-light performance and increased dynamic range. Additionally, the Sony a7 III boasts a high DXOMARK sensor score of 96, which is not available for the Fujifilm X-H2 as DXOMARK does not score Fujifilm cameras. These aspects give the Sony a7 III an edge in terms of image quality and low-light capability.
Despite the differences, both cameras offer excellent optical performance. The Fujifilm X-H2 is ideal for photographers who prioritize high-resolution images and fast shooting speeds, while the Sony a7 III is better suited for those who value image quality and low-light performance. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.
|
Optics
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 40 MP | 24.2 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 7728 x 5152 px | 6000 x 4000 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | 23.8 x 35.6 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  APS-C |  Full Frame | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 15 fps | 10 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Fujifilm X | Sony FE | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | X-Processor 5 | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 125 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 12,800 | 51,200 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 80 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 204800 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 8000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 425 | 693 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   | | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 5,760,000 dots | 2,359,296 dots |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7 III Video Performance
The Fujifilm X-H2 outperforms the Sony a7 III in video capabilities, with a video score of 83/100 compared to the Sony a7 III’s 56/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as 4K maximum video resolution and 3840 x 2160 maximum video dimensions.
The Fujifilm X-H2 surpasses the Sony a7 III in video frame rate, offering 60fps compared to the Sony a7 III’s 30fps. This higher frame rate allows for smoother motion and better slow-motion capabilities in the X-H2. Additionally, the Fujifilm X-H2 includes built-in time-lapse functionality, making it more versatile for capturing dynamic scenes over an extended period.
In contrast, the Sony a7 III does not offer any significant advantages in video capabilities when compared to the Fujifilm X-H2. Its lower video frame rate and lack of built-in time-lapse functionality contribute to its lower video score.
Considering these differences, the Fujifilm X-H2 is the clear winner in video capabilities. Its higher video frame rate and built-in time-lapse functionality provide more creative options and better overall video performance. The Sony a7 III, while still offering 4K video, falls short in comparison due to its lower frame rate and lack of time-lapse functionality.
|
Video
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K | 4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 3840 x 2160 px | 3840 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 60 p | 30 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  |  | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4, MOV | XAVC S, AVCHD |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7 III Features and Benefits
The Fujifilm X-H2 emerges as the winner in terms of features, scoring 85/100, while the Sony a7 III scores 81/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, flip screen, absence of GPS, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth.
The Fujifilm X-H2 stands out with its superior screen resolution of 1,620,000 dots compared to the Sony a7 III’s 921,600 dots. This higher resolution allows users to view images and videos with greater clarity and detail on the X-H2. The four-point difference in the feature score also highlights the X-H2’s edge in providing a more comprehensive user experience.
Despite having a lower score, the Sony a7 III still has its merits. Both cameras possess the same screen size, touchscreen, flip screen, and connectivity options, showing that the a7 III does not lag far behind the X-H2. While its screen resolution is lower, it still offers users a satisfactory viewing experience, especially if they do not require extremely high-resolution displays.
Considering these points, the Fujifilm X-H2 proves to be the better choice for those who prioritize higher screen resolution and a slightly more advanced feature set. On the other hand, the Sony a7 III remains a solid option for users who are content with a lower screen resolution and a slightly less competitive feature score. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on individual preferences and specific requirements.
|
Features
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,620,000 dots | 921,600 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7 III Storage and Battery
The Fujifilm X-H2 triumphs over the Sony a7 III in storage and battery, scoring 79/100 compared to the Sony’s 68/100. Both cameras possess two memory card slots, with the X-H2 accepting CFexpress Type B and SD (UHS-II Compatible) cards, while the a7 III takes SD/SDHC/SDXC and Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo cards.
The X-H2 outperforms the a7 III with its USB charging capability, a feature absent in the Sony model. However, the a7 III holds a slight advantage in battery life, offering 750 shots compared to the X-H2’s 680 shots. Despite this, the Fujifilm X-H2’s NP-W235 battery type and overall storage and battery score make it the superior choice for photographers seeking extended shooting sessions and better storage options.
Though the Sony a7 III falls short in this comparison, its longer battery life may still appeal to some users. Ultimately, the Fujifilm X-H2’s higher storage and battery score reflects its advantages in USB charging and memory card compatibility, making it the preferred choice in this category.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | CFexpress Type B, SD (UHS-II Compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | NP-W235 | NP-FZ100 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 680 shots | 750 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 25.1 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 14.7 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 3722 |
|
Scores
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
Main Features | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Extra Features | N/A | ||
Construction and Durability | N/A | ||
Handling and Ergonomics | N/A | ||
Value for Money | N/A | ||
Total Score | N/A |
Alternatives to the Fujifilm X-H2 and Sony a7 III
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-H2 or the Sony a7 III:
|
User Scores
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 III
|