CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Leica SL2-S vs Sony a7 III Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Leica SL2-S

leica sl2s
81%
Draw!

Sony a7 III

Sony A7 III camera
81%
Leica SL2-S
vs
Sony a7 III
Price
4895
2000
Brand
Leica
Sony
Model
SL2-S
a7 III
Released
2020
2018
Announcement Date
10/12/2020
27/02/2018
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
146 x 107 x 83 mm
127 x 96 x 74 mm
Camera Weight
931
650
Compare

The Leica SL2-S and the Sony a7 III score head to head in our comparison. Both cameras are mirrorless and share some common specifications. However, the Leica SL2-S, released in 2020, boasts a higher launch price of $4895 and a larger size of 146 x 107 x 83mm, contributing to its heavier weight of 931g (2.05lbs).

On the other hand, the Sony a7 III, released in 2018, has a more affordable launch price of $2000 and a smaller size of 127 x 96 x 74mm, making it lighter at 650g (1.43lbs). While the Leica SL2-S has a slight advantage in performance, the Sony a7 III offers a more budget-friendly and compact option for photographers. Each camera has its strengths, so the choice ultimately depends on the user’s preferences and needs.

Leica SL2-S vs Sony a7 III Overview and Optics

The Leica SL2-S comes out on top in this optics comparison, with a score of 85/100, compared to the Sony a7 III’s score of 81/100. Both cameras share several common specifications, such as a CMOS sensor, full-frame sensor size, and image stabilization. However, there are key differences that set the Leica SL2-S apart.

The Leica SL2-S has a slight edge in megapixels, featuring 24.6 compared to the Sony a7 III’s 24.2. This difference contributes to the Leica’s higher score. Additionally, the Leica SL2-S has a significantly faster shooting speed of 20 frames per second, doubling the Sony a7 III’s 10 frames per second. This faster shooting speed allows the Leica SL2-S to capture more images in a shorter amount of time, making it better suited for action photography.

The Sony a7 III does have one advantage over the Leica SL2-S: its DXOMARK sensor score of 96, which is one point higher than the Leica SL2-S’s score of 95. This suggests that the Sony a7 III’s sensor may perform slightly better in certain situations, such as low-light photography.

However, the Leica SL2-S’s higher overall score, increased megapixels, and faster shooting speed make it the superior camera in terms of optics. The Sony a7 III’s marginally higher DXOMARK sensor score does not significantly impact the overall comparison. Therefore, the Leica SL2-S is the better choice for photographers seeking a camera with superior optics.

Optics
Optics
85%
81%
Megapixels
24.6 MP
24.2 MP
Image Resolution
6000 x 4000 px
6000 x 4000 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
24 x 36 mm
23.8 x 35.6 mm
Sensor Format
Full Frame
Full Frame
Frame Rate
20 fps
10 fps
Lens Mount
Leica L
Sony FE
Image Processor
Maestro III
Bionz X
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
50
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
100000
51200
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
50
50
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
100000
204800
Minimum Shutter Speed
60 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 16000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
225
693
In-body Stabilization
1
1
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
5760000 dots
2359296 dots

Leica SL2-S vs Sony a7 III Video Performance

The Leica SL2-S outperforms the Sony a7 III in video capabilities with a score of 83/100, a significant 27-point lead over the Sony a7 III’s score of 70. Both cameras offer 4K video resolution, but the Leica SL2-S has superior video dimensions at 4096 x 2160 compared to the Sony a7 III’s 3840 x 2160.

One primary advantage of the Leica SL2-S over the Sony a7 III is its higher maximum video frame rate of 60fps, while the Sony a7 III maxes out at 30fps. This higher frame rate allows the Leica SL2-S to capture smoother and more detailed video, especially in fast-paced situations.

 

Video
Video
83%
56%
Video
1
1
Max Video Resolution
4K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
4096 x 2160 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
30 p
Time-Lapse Built In
1
Video File Format
MPEG-4
XAVC S, AVCHD

Leica SL2-S vs Sony a7 III Features and Benefits

The Sony a7 III outperforms the Leica SL2-S in features, scoring 81 out of 100 compared to the Leica SL2-S’s score of 74. Both cameras share some common specifications, including touchscreen capabilities, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity. However, the two cameras differ in other key aspects, which contribute to the Sony a7 III’s higher score.

The Sony a7 III has a flip screen, which the Leica SL2-S lacks. This feature enhances the camera’s versatility, allowing for more flexible shooting angles and better framing options. In contrast, the Leica SL2-S has a higher screen resolution, boasting 2,100,000 dots compared to the Sony a7 III’s 921,600 dots. This results in crisper and clearer image previews on the Leica SL2-S. Despite the higher resolution, the lack of a flip screen makes the Leica SL2-S less versatile in terms of usability.

The Sony a7 III’s higher feature score makes it a better camera in terms of versatility and ease of use, thanks to its flip screen. However, the Leica SL2-S offers superior screen resolution, providing users with a more detailed preview of their images. Both cameras have their strengths and weaknesses, with the Sony a7 III being more adaptable, and the Leica SL2-S offering a higher quality viewing experience.

When considering these factors, the Sony a7 III emerges as the more practical and versatile option for most photographers, while the Leica SL2-S may appeal to those who prioritize screen resolution and image preview quality.

Features
Features
74%
81%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
1
1
GPS
Weather Sealing
1
1
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
1
1
Screen Size
3.2
3
Screen Resolution
2100000 dots
921600 dots
Flip Screen
1
Live View
1
Wi-Fi
1
1
Bluetooth
1
1

Leica SL2-S vs Sony a7 III Storage and Battery

The Leica SL2-S and the Sony a7 III share common features, such as having two memory card slots and accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards.

However, the Sony a7 III has a longer battery life of 750 shots, while the Leica SL2-S offers 510 shots per charge. This extended battery life is beneficial for photographers who need to capture a large number of images without frequently changing batteries.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
73%
81%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC
SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo
Dual Memory Card Slots
1
1
Battery Type
BP-SCL4
NP-FZ100
Battery Life
510 shots
750 shots
USB Charging
1
1
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
95
96
Portrait (Color Depth)
25.2 bits
25.1 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
14.1 EVs
14.7 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
3504
3722
Scores
Main Features
84
Extra Features
72
Construction and Durability
67
Handling and Ergonomics
67
Value for Money
110
Total Score
81

Leica SL2-S vs Sony a7 III Alternatives

User Scores
B&H photo video
1
1
amazon
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!