CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Sony a6600 vs a9 II Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Sony a6600

sony a6600
75%

Sony a9 II

Sony a9 II
Winner!
82%
Sony a6600
vs
Sony a9 II
Price
1025
4500
Brand
Sony
Sony
Model
a6600
a9 II
Released
2019
2019
Announcement Date
28/08/2019
03/10/2019
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
120 x 67 x 69 mm
129 x 96 x 76 mm
Camera Weight
503
678
Compare

The Sony a9 II emerges as the winner with a score of 82/100, outperforming the Sony a6600, which scored 75/100. Both cameras share similarities as mirrorless models, released in 2019. The a9 II excels with its larger size (129 x 96 x 76mm) and heavier weight (678g / 1.49lbs), providing a more robust feel and professional experience. On the other hand, the a6600 has its advantages, being more compact (120 x 67 x 69mm) and lighter (503g / 1.11lbs), making it easier to carry around.

Considering the price, the a6600 is a more budget-friendly option at $1200, while the a9 II is significantly pricier at $4500. Despite the cost difference, the a9 II’s higher score reflects its superior performance and features. The a6600, however, still offers great value for its price.

Sony a6600 vs a9 II Overview and Optics

The Sony a9 II takes the lead in optics with a score of 82/100, while the Sony a6600 trails behind with a score of 76/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as 24.2 megapixels, CMOS sensor type, Bionz X processor, and image stabilization. They also both utilize the Sony lens mount, with the a6600 using the E mount and the a9 II using the FE mount.

The Sony a9 II excels with its higher DXOMARK sensor score of 93, compared to the a6600’s 82. This difference results in better image quality and low-light performance. Additionally, the a9 II boasts a full-frame sensor size, which provides a wider field of view and improved dynamic range. Its shooting speed of 20 frames per second also surpasses the a6600’s 11 frames per second, making it an ideal choice for action and sports photography.

On the other hand, the Sony a6600 has its own advantages, such as the smaller APS-C sensor size. This feature makes the camera more compact and lightweight, which could be beneficial for travel and casual photography. However, the a6600’s lower DXOMARK score and shooting speed may limit its versatility in more demanding situations.

Taking these factors into account, the Sony a9 II is the clear winner in terms of optics, offering superior image quality, low-light performance, and faster shooting speed. The Sony a6600, while more compact and lightweight, does not match the a9 II’s capabilities in these areas. Therefore, photographers seeking the best optical performance should opt for the Sony a9 II, while those prioritizing portability may find the Sony a6600 more suitable.

Optics
Optics
76%
82%
Megapixels
24.2 MP
24.2 MP
Image Resolution
6000 x 4000 px
6000 x 4000 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
15.6 x 23.5 mm
23.8 x 35.6 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
Full Frame
Frame Rate
11 fps
20 fps
Lens Mount
Sony E
Sony FE
Image Processor
Bionz X
Bionz X
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
50
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
102400
51200
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
50
50
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
102400
204800
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 32000 s
Autofocus Points
425
693
In-body Stabilization
1
1
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
2359296 dots
3686400 dots

Sony a6600 vs a9 II Video Performance

The Sony a6600 is the superior camera for video capabilities, scoring 91/100 compared to the Sony a9 II’s score of 70/100. Both cameras share common specifications, including 4K maximum video resolution and 3840 x 2160 maximum video dimensions. Additionally, both cameras have built-in time-lapse functionality.

The Sony a6600 outperforms the Sony a9 II in terms of video capabilities due to its higher maximum video frame rate. The a6600 can capture video at 100fps, while the a9 II can only capture at 30fps. This difference allows the a6600 to produce smoother videos, especially when capturing fast-moving subjects or creating slow-motion footage.

While the Sony a9 II may not have a higher video frame rate, it still offers solid video performance. The 4K video resolution and built-in time-lapse functionality provide versatility for various video projects. However, the a6600’s superior frame rate sets it apart from the a9 II in this comparison.

The Sony a6600’s higher video score is a direct result of its better video capabilities, specifically the higher maximum video frame rate. This feature provides smoother video footage and greater flexibility for video creators. Although the Sony a9 II has a lower score, it still offers quality video performance with its 4K resolution and time-lapse functionality. Ultimately, the Sony a6600 is the better choice for those prioritizing video capabilities.

Video
Video
91%
70%
Video
1
1
Max Video Resolution
4K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
30 p
30 p
Time-Lapse Built In
1
1
Video File Format
MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
XAVC S, AVCHD

Sony a6600 vs a9 II Features and Benefits

The Sony a9 II emerges as the winner in the features comparison, scoring 83/100, while the Sony a6600 trails closely with a score of 81/100. Both cameras share several common specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capabilities, flip screen, GPS absence, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.

The Sony a9 II takes the lead primarily due to its superior screen resolution, boasting 1,440,000 dots compared to the Sony a6600’s 921,600 dots. This higher resolution results in a crisper and more detailed display, enhancing the user’s experience while composing shots and reviewing images.

However, the Sony a6600 is not without its advantages. It shares many of the same features as the Sony a9 II, making it a competitive option in the market. Its score of 81/100 indicates that it is a strong contender and would still satisfy the needs of many photographers.

In comparing these two cameras, it is evident that the Sony a9 II has a slight edge over the Sony a6600 in terms of features, particularly with its higher screen resolution. Nevertheless, the Sony a6600 remains a reliable and capable camera, offering many of the same benefits as its counterpart. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the individual photographer’s priorities and preferences. While the Sony a9 II may be the winner in this comparison, the Sony a6600’s strong feature set ensures that it remains a worthwhile consideration for those seeking a high-quality camera.

Features
Features
81%
83%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
1
1
GPS
Weather Sealing
1
1
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
1
1
Screen Size
3
3
Screen Resolution
921600 dots
1440000 dots
Flip Screen
1
1
Live View
1
1
Wi-Fi
1
1
Bluetooth
1
1

Sony a6600 vs a9 II Storage and Battery

The Sony a9 II triumphs over the Sony a6600 in storage and battery with a score of 79/100, leaving the latter with a score of 48/100. Both cameras accept SD/SDHC/SDXC memory cards and feature USB charging. They also share the same battery type, NP-FZ100.

The a9 II excels with its dual memory card slots, allowing for more storage capacity and flexibility. Additionally, its memory cards are UHS-II compatible, ensuring faster data transfer rates. Despite these advantages, the a9 II falls short in battery life, offering 690 shots compared to the a6600’s 810 shots.

While the Sony a6600 may lack in storage options, its longer battery life may appeal to users who prioritize shooting time over storage capacity. Ultimately, the Sony a9 II offers superior storage capabilities for users seeking ample storage and fast data transfer, while the Sony a6600 provides a longer battery life for extended shooting sessions.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
48%
79%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
Dual Memory Card Slots
1
Battery Type
NP-FZ100
NP-FZ100
Battery Life
810 shots
690 shots
USB Charging
1
1
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
82
93
Portrait (Color Depth)
23.8 bits
25 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
13.4 EVs
14 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
1497
3434
Scores
Main Features
Extra Features
Construction and Durability
Handling and Ergonomics
Value for Money
Total Score

Alternatives to the Sony a6600 and a9 II

Sony a6600 vs a9 II Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Sony a6600 or the Sony a9 II:

User Scores
B&H photo video
1
1
amazon
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!